Friday, April 25, 2025

Audiobooks.com - Don't You Dare!


Google AI search result: Audiobooks.com free trial reviews are generally negative, with many users reporting issues like deceptive advertising, unexpected charges, and poor customer service. Specifically, the service has been criticized for not fulfilling its advertised "3 free audiobooks" claim, only offering one free book after the 30-day trial. Additionally, users have reported being charged for a subscription they didn't authorize after the trial, leading to difficulties in getting refunds (Trustpilot)

Thursday, April 24, 2025

Caroline Brewin - Using Neuroscience to Maximize Your Presence (Confidence)


Caroline Brewin - author of "Confident". YouTube


Dealing with an amygdala hijack


Brendon Burchard : Confidence is your belief in your ability to figure things out.

The facts - we are wired for a negativity bias because survival is our number one priority.

Physical

Polish/Grooming; Fit, healthy, attractive; Body lanaguage. 

Body Language, particularly eye contact and being able to hold room and have eye contact with each of those people in the room is a crucial part of people seeing you as having presence

Mental

Decisiveness, resilience, optimism

Awareness

Knowing your core values (congruence gives you authenticity - a crucial part of executive presence). Gives you cognitive anchors - allow the brain to return to clarity and self-regulation. Builds neural consistency. 

Acceptance

Confidence is grounding in your true self, integrating your internal and external authenticity - Jane Grafton.

Action

One small step - integrate your wins. Monday morning - make a list of things you accomplished last week that you're really proud of. Maybe the wonder-woman pose goes along with it.

Wednesday, April 23, 2025

Confucius - You're Wise If You Give in When You're Wrong


Airbnb will now show the total cost of a stay, including all fees before taxes, in search results and on the listing page. This change is part of a broader shift towards more transparent pricing on the platform and is intended to make it easier for guests to compare options and budget accordingly.

Apparently, this is how hosts were able to rake in more - but making their listings appear cheap, and then adding on.. Poor us.

Sunday, April 20, 2025

If You Didn't Know About Pig Butchering Scams

Sue-Lin Wong of the Economist

https://www.happyscribe.com/public/scam-inc-from-the-economist/1-4c3b222f-7928-4458-aace-c140cbec06a7

A poster for sale on Amazon

Karina's story

I understood it because I thought he might be an introvert like myself. Then I thought, well, maybe he has a language barrier. So I didn't push it for probably a few more weeks. Even when there were times that I would question him why we hadn't talked yet or met in person, he always had a great way of re-solidifying my confidence in him and what we were doing in this relationship. Just by feeding me the information I wanted to hear, things that he valued about me or things that he liked about me and how he was planning for our future together. And he had told me, probably at three and a half weeks, that he loved me. That was crazy. We hadn't met yet. And I said that, again, for me to question him and to say something like, You don't know me, he would turn it around and say, he's like, But I do know you. And again, how can you question us in this?



Karina took out $30,000 to trade with. It was a lot of money, and perhaps should have been another red flag. But her Tether balance was growing. Then, Evan suggested she take it to the next level by registering for a special investment event. He neglected to mention, though, that to take part, she'd need to invest a huge amount by the end of the month.

Once I realized I needed 150,000, I freaked out because I told Evan, I don't have this money. Why did you tell me to register for 150,000? I didn't know what I was doing. I was just blindly following his instructions.

If she didn't come up with the money in time, she have to pay a massive penalty. She panicked. Evan told her not to think so negatively. He said that she had options.

I called various loan providers, and I was able to get a $38,000 loan, and I was really proud of myself for getting this. The interest rate was 26%.


Story (CNBC)



Jalil (Ugandan victim) They had these slogans they would always chant before we start to work every day. And it was something like "crypto, the US and the European economy". And then I don’t know if it is what he said or it’s just the translator who I did it, but then he said, "This is World War Three."


The issue has also spilled over into Thailand, after a high-profile case involving 22-year-old Chinese actor Wang Xing, who vanished in Tak Province, near the Myanmar border. Reports suggest he was abducted and trafficked into a scam center, sparking an outcry on Chinese social media. He was found and released in early January about a week after he went missing.

I’ve seen satellite images of these compounds. You look at an image from a few years ago and there’s almost nothing. A couple of shacks in some fields. Now there are neat clusters of hundreds of warehouses, offices and apartment blocks--Sue-Lin Wong (the Economist)

If people fall for the trick in spite of the Thai Police warning at the Myanmar border, it must be because the Thai Police are using the Yahoo's feeble attempt at a chatGPT clone to generate the copy. Some cool new words here : "Cituttities at risk include China, India, Kenya,..." "Easy work, good income, accontmadistion and foodl, with a solicitation announcement through online media forced to labor or sold to new employers in chainse abused in some cases, blood transfusions or organs for sale." Who can take this seriously when it sounds so comical?


Newsweek

2020



2024

So, on the first day, I had nothing to do. They just gave you a computer and there were four little documents, and I had to read and go through those four word documents. I had to read them carefully again and again and again when I was reading it. What I understood is like it’s like it’s just a normal chat between two people. They had gotten to know each other online. Hi, how are you? I saw your photo. I like that colour. How is the with these initial conversations which is moving on to flirting and the love stage? Okay. You are my this one. You are my sunshine. You are my love. (Victim statement)

Rita: We are not allowed to speak in black America.

Sue-Lin Wong: Not allowed to speak to black Americans.

Rita: Yes, we were not I don’t know why.

Sue-Lin Wong: It’s not hard to guess why this is racism. An assumption that black Americans will have less money. Racial profiling was part of the playbook. Only white Americans.

Jalil: My productivity went low. That is when the punishment started coming in. There was a parking lot outside and places. It’s really hot there. So they would make you run around the parking lot with the scorching sun. There was lots of punishments in there, like you don’t hit your targets. They electrocute you. They had tasers that would come and electrocute you.

Photo of training material posted on Reddit



Wednesday, April 16, 2025

Gems David Ogilvy Bequeaths to You


https://makucopywriter.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/CONFESSIONS-OF-AN-ADVERTISING-MAN-OGILVY.pdf

How to get the ship launched:

  1. Invite reporters, share agency vision, gain free publicity and valuable business leads.
  2. Deliver two bold annual speeches to provoke maximum buzz on Madison Avenue.

  3. Befriend consultants and salesmen who connect with major advertisers through mutual benefit.

  4. Send regular updates to 600 influencers, ensuring lasting impressions and winning new clients.

Gentle reader, if you are shocked by these confessions of self-advertisement, I can only plead that if I had behaved in a more professional way, it would have taken me twenty years to arrive. I had neither the time nor the money to wait. I was poor, unknown, and in a hurry.

When a good man quits, his cronies wonder why, and generally suspect that he has been mistreated by management. Recently I have found a way to prevent this misunderstanding. When my young copy chief resigned to become Vice Chairman of another agency, he and I exchanged letters in the style of a cabinet minister resigning to a Prime Minister, and they were printed in our staff magazine. The dear defector wrote to me: 

You must accept the blame for what I am as an advertising man. You invented me and have taught me how much I do not know. You once said that you should have charged me tuition all these years, and it’s true. 


Few of the great creators have bland personalities. They are cantankerous egotists, the kind of men who are unwelcome in the modern corporation. Consider Winston Churchill. He drank like a fish. He was capricious and willful. When opposed, he sulked. He was rude to fools. He was wildly extravagant. He wept on the slightest provocation. His conversation was Rabelaisian. He was inconsiderate to his staff. Yet Lord Alanbrooke, his Chief of Staff, could write:

I shall always look back on the years I worked with him as some of the most difficult and trying ones in my life. For all that I thank God that I was given the opportunity of working alongside of such a man, and of having my eyes opened to the fact that occasionally such supermen exist on this earth. 

Account criteria:

  1. The product must be one which we would be proud to advertise.
  2. I never accept an account unless I believe that we can do a conspicuously better job than the previous agency.
  3. I steer clear of products whose sales have been falling over a long period.
  4. It is important to find out whether the prospective client wants his agency to make a profit.
  5. If the account is unlikely to be profitable, would it give you a chance to create remarkable advertising?
  6. The relationship between a manufacturer and his advertising agency is almost as intimate as the relationship between a patient and his doctor.
  7. I avoid clients for whom advertising is only a marginal factor in their marketing mix.
  8. I never take new products, before they have emerged from the laboratory, unless they are included in a hamper with another product.
  9. If you aspire to produce great advertising, never take associations as clients.
  10. Sometimes a prospective client offers you business on condition that you hire an individual whom he believes to be indispensable to the management of his advertising.
Illustrating the ninth point:

“Mr. Ogilvy,” said the chairman, “we are interviewing several agencies. You have exactly fifteen minutes to plead your case. Then I will ring this bell, and the representative of the next agency, who is already waiting outside, will follow you.” Before launching into my pitch, I asked three questions: “How many of the end-uses for rayon must be covered in your campaign?” Answer: automobile tires, furnishing fabrics, industrial products, women’s clothing, men’s clothing. “How much money is available?” Answer: $600,000. “How many people must OK the advertisements?” Answer: the twelve members of the Committee, representing twelve manufacturers. “Ring the bell!” I said, and walked out. Them’s the conditions what prevail with almost all association accounts. Too many masters, too many objectives, too little money.


Picking an agency:

The sensible way to pick an agency is to employ an advertising manager who knows enough about what is going on in the advertising world to have an informed judgment. Ask him to show you representative advertisements and commercials from the three or four agencies he believes to be best qualified for your account.

Then call some of their clients on the telephone. This can be particularly revealing when you call advertisers like Procter & Gamble, Lever, Colgate, General Foods, and Bristol-Myers, who employ several agencies; they can give you cross-bearings on most of the top agencies.

Then invite the chief executive from each of the leading contenders to bring two of his key men to dine at your house. Loosen their tongues. Find out if they are discreet about the secrets of their present clients. Find out if they have the spine to disagree when you say something stupid. Observe their relationship with each other; are they professional colleagues or quarrelsome politicians? Do they promise you results which are obviously exaggerated? Do they sound like extinct volcanoes, or are they alive? Are they good listeners? Are they intellectually honest?

Above all, find out if you like them; the relationship between client and agency has to be an intimate one, and it can be hell if the personal chemistry is sour.

Don’t make the mistake of assuming that your account will be neglected in a big agency. The young men at the working levels in big agencies are often abler and harder-working than the nabobs at the top. On the other hand, don’t assume that a big agency can give you more service than a small one. The number of bodies deployed against your account will be roughly the same in a small agency as in a big one


Here, then, are my recipes for cooking up the kind of advertising campaigns which make the cash register ring—eleven commandments which you must obey if you work at my agency:

1. What You Say Is More Important Than How You Say It.
Once upon a time I was riding on the top of a Fifth Avenue bus, when I heard a mythical housewife say to another, “Molly, my dear, I would have bought that new brand of toilet soap if only they hadn’t set the body copy in ten point Garamond.”
Don’t you believe it.

2. Unless Your Campaign Is Built Around a Great Idea, It Will Flop.
It isn’t every client who can recognize a great idea when he sees it. I remember presenting a truly brilliant idea to a client who said, “Mr. Ogilvy, you have here the mucus of a good idea.” When I started writing advertisements, I was determined to blaze new trails, to make every one of my campaigns the most successful in the history of the industry concerned.

3. Give the Facts.
Very few advertisements contain enough factual information to sell the product.
There is a ludicrous tradition among copywriters that consumers aren’t interested in facts. Nothing could be farther from the truth.

4. You Cannot Bore People into Buying.
The average family is now exposed to more than 1500 advertisements a day. No wonder they have acquired a talent for skipping the advertisements in newspapers and magazines, and going to the bathroom during television commercials. The average woman now reads only four of the advertisements which appear in the average magazine.

5. Be Well-Mannered, But Don’t Clown.
People don’t buy from bad-mannered salesmen, and research has shown that they don’t buy from bad-mannered advertisements. It is easier to sell people with a friendly handshake than by hitting them over the head with a hammer. You should try to charm the consumer into buying your product.

6. Make Your Advertising Contemporary.
The young housewife of 1963 was born after President Roosevelt died. She is living in a new world. At the age of fifty-one I am finding it increasingly difficult to tune in on the young married couples who are starting out in life.

7. Committees Can Criticize Advertisements, But They Cannot Write Them.
A lot of advertisements and television commercials look like the minutes of a committee meeting, and that is what they are. Advertising seems to sell most when it is written by a solitary individual. He must study the product, the research, and the precedents.

8. If You Are Lucky Enough To Write a Good Advertisement, Repeat It Until It Stops Pulling.
Scores of good advertisements have been discarded before they lost their potency, largely because their sponsors got sick of seeing them.
Sterling Getchel’s famous advertisement for Plymouth (“Look at All Three”) appeared only once, and was succeeded by a series of inferior variations which were quickly forgotten.
But the Sherwin Cody School of English ran the same advertisement (“Do You Make These Mistakes in English?”) for forty-two years, changing only the type face and the color of Mr. Cody’s beard.

9. Never Write an Advertisement Which You Wouldn’t Want Your Own Family To Read.
You wouldn’t tell lies to your own wife.
Don’t tell them to mine.
Do as you would be done by.

10. The Image and the Brand.
Every advertisement should be thought of as a contribution to the complex symbol which is the brand image.
If you take that long view, a great many day-to-day problems solve themselves.
How do you decide what kind of image to build?


You aren’t advertising to a standing army; you are advertising to a moving parade. Three million consumers get married every year. The advertisement which sold a refrigerator to those who got married last year will probably be just as successful with those who get married next year. One million, seven hundred thousand consumers die every year, and 4,000,000 new ones are born. They enter the market and they depart from it. An advertisement is like a radar sweep, constantly hunting new prospects as they come into the market. Get a good radar, and keep It sweeping.



One of our Rinso advertisements told housewives how to remove stains. It was better read (Starch) and better remembered (Gallup) than any detergent advertisement in history. Unfortunately, however, it forgot to feature Rinso’s main selling promise —that Rinso washes whiter; for this reason it should never have run. The photograph showed several different kinds of stain— lipstick, coffee, shoe-polish, blood and so forth. The blood was my own; I am the only copywriter who has ever bled for his client



When you use a photograph of a woman, men ignore your advertisement. When you use a photograph of a man, you exclude women from your audience. 

If you want to attract women readers, your best bet is to use a photograph of a baby. Research has shown that they stop almost twice as many women as photographs of families. When you were a baby you were the cynosure of every eye, but by the time you became a mere member of the family, you attracted no special attention.

Men don’t like the same kind of girls that girls like. 

Advertisements are twice as memorable, on the average, when they are illustrated in color. 

Avoid historical subjects. They may be useful for advertising whiskey, but for nothing else.



Magazine editors have discovered that people read the explanatory captions under photographs more than they read the text of articles; and the same thing is true of advertisements. When we analyzed Starch data on advertisements in Life, we found that on the average twice as many people read the captions as read the body copy. Thus captions offer you twice the audience you get for body copy. It follows that you should never use a photograph without putting a caption under it, and each caption should be a miniature ad , complete with brand name and promise.



Food products on TV:

(18) Use the problem-solution gambit whenever you can do so without being farfetched. 
(19) Whenever possible, give news—and play it loud and clear.



Tourism:

(2) Tourists do not travel thousands of miles to see things which they can see next door. For example, people who live in Switzerland cannot be persuaded to travel five thousand miles to see the mountains in Colorado. Advertise what is unique in your country. 

(3) Your advertisements should establish in the reader’s mind an image which she will never forget. The period of gestation between exposure to an advertisement and the purchase of a ticket is likely to be very long.

When deciding which countries to visit when he goes abroad, the American tourist is influenced by his attitude to the local inhabitants. My surveys show that he expects the British to be polite, cultured, honest, straightforward, clean and moral. But he also expects them to be aloof, pompous and doleful. So, in our advertising, we do our best to correct the disagreeable aspects of this stereotype by writing about the friendliness of English people.



How to Rise to the Top of the Tree

When Dr. William B. Shockley studied the creativity of scientists in the Bell Laboratories, he discovered that those in the most creative quartile applied for ten times as many patents as those in the least creative quartile, but were paid only 50 per cent more. Unfair? Yes, I think so. Albert Lasker used to pay the less productive copywriters at Lord & Thomas $1000 a week, but he paid Claude Hopkins $50,000 for every $1,000,000 worth of advertising he wrote.

First, you must be ambitious, but you must not be so nakedly aggressive that your fellow workers rise up and destroy you. Tout soldat pone dans sa giberne le baton de marechal. Yes, but don’t let it stick out.

After a year of tedious training, you will probably be made an assistant account executive—a sort of midshipman. The moment that happens, set yourself to becoming the best-informed man in the agency on the account to which you are assigned. If, for example, it is a gasoline account, read text books on the chemistry, geology and distribution of petroleum products. Read all the trade journals in the field. Read all the research reports and marketing plans that your agency has ever written on the product. Spend Saturday mornings in service stations, pumping gasoline and talking to motorists. Visit your client’s refineries and research laboratories. Study the advertising of his competitors. At the end of your second year, you will know more about gasoline than your boss; you will then be ready to succeed him.

In my bachelor days I used to work until the small hours. If you prefer to spend all your spare time growing roses or playing with your children, I like you better, but do not complain that you are not being promoted fast enough. Managers promote the men who produce the most.


Il faut epater les clients


Frank Hummert, who succeeded Claude Hopkins as copy chief of Lord & Thomas and then made a fortune as the inventor of soap operas, once told me: “All clients are pigs. You may start by thinking otherwise, but you will change your mind.” 

This has not been my experience. I have encountered a handful of pigs and I have resigned them. But with a very few exceptions, I have loved my clients.


I offer this recipe for refreshing vacations:

 Don’t stay at home and putter around the house. You need a change of scene.

 Take your wife, but leave the children with a neighbor. Small fry are a pain in the neck on a vacation. Shut yourself off from exposure to advertising.

Take a sleeping pill every night for the first three nights.

 Get plenty of fresh air and exercise.

 Read a book every day—twenty-one books in three weeks. (I assume that you have already taken the Book-of-the-Month Club’s rapid reading course, and that you can do 1,000 words a minute.)

 Broaden your horizons by going abroad, even if you have to travel steerage. But don’t travel so much that you come back cross and exhausted.


Orwell on French hygiene:

In Down and Out in Paris and London, George Orwell gives a scathing yet vivid account of his experiences working in the kitchens of Parisian hotels and restaurants. His depiction of French kitchens, especially in the lower-tier establishments, is far from flattering. Some key points Orwell makes include:

  1. Filth and Squalor: Orwell describes the kitchens as disgustingly dirty. He notes that food is often prepared in unsanitary conditions, with grime, rats, and general neglect being commonplace. For example, in the Hôtel X, where he works as a plongeur (dishwasher), he talks about the filth, roaches, and casual attitude toward cleanliness.

  2. Hierarchical Brutality: The structure within the kitchens is rigid and almost military-like, with head chefs ruling by fear. Orwell portrays the plongeur's life as one of constant exhaustion, low pay, and no respect, caught in a cycle of toil that leaves no time or energy for anything else.

  3. Illusion of French Culinary Excellence: One of Orwell’s striking observations is how the celebrated glamour of French cuisine is, in reality, propped up by overworked, underpaid staff laboring in filthy conditions. The outward appearance of fine dining is maintained at the expense of those behind the scenes.

  4. Desensitization and Survival: He describes how workers become numb to the dirt and suffering around them, accepting it as normal because survival demands it.

A representative quote:

“In the kitchen the dirt was worse than in the dining-room. It was dark, stuffy and stinking, with grease-laden air that you could cut with a knife… The dishwasher’s job was one of the hardest and most thankless.”

Orwell’s critique isn’t aimed just at French kitchens, but rather uses them to illustrate broader social injustices and the inhuman conditions of the working poor. The glamour associated with the French culinary tradition stands in stark contrast to the grimy, backbreaking reality he exposes.

1. On the filth in the scullery adjacent to the dining room:

“It was amusing to look round the filthy little scullery and think that only a double door was between us and the dining-room. There sat the customers in all their splendour—spotless table-cloths, bowls of flowers, mirrors and gilt cornices and painted cherubim; and here, just a few feet away, we in our disgusting filth. For it really was disgusting filth. There was no time to sweep the floor till evening, and we slithered about in a compound of soapy water, lettuce-leaves, torn paper and trampled food.”Telelib

— Chapter 12


2. On the state of the kitchen at the Auberge de Jehan Cottard:

“Looking round that filthy room, with raw meat lying among the refuse on the floor, and cold, clotted saucepans sprawling everywhere, and the sink blocked and coated with grease, I used to wonder whether there could be a restaurant in the world as bad as ours.”Lib Quotes

— Chapter 21


3. On the unsanitary practices of French cooks:

“In the kitchen the dirt was worse. It is not a figure of speech, it is a mere statement of fact to say that a French cook will spit in the soup—that is, if he is not going to drink it himself. He is an artist, but his art is not cleanliness.”Commander Kelly

— Chapter 10

------------


Tuesday, April 15, 2025

Blacklisted TED Talks - Ones You Shouldn't Waste Your Time On


There might be something in them, but the ethical thing to do is to reduce them to a single slide so that people can spend 30 seconds on them rather than 10 minutes!

Culprit: Engineering the Human Nervous System: Megan Moynahan at TEDxBrussels

Takeaways:

  1. We can restore movement after paralysis using existing technology.
  2. Muscles still work — we just need to reconnect the signals.
  3. Engineering alone isn’t enough without access and support.
  4. Small patient groups get left behind by profit-driven models.
  5. Nonprofits and new ideas can finally close the gap.
---

What is a Thought? How the Brain Creates New Ideas | Henning Beck | TEDxHHL

Statements are outdated - in fairness, chatGPT was more recent than eight years ago..

✅ Do's
  1. Focus deeply, then step away — Engage with the problem fully, then take a break with something unrelated to spark new connections.
  2. Create space for inspiration — Like the ancient idea of the muse, set up a relaxed, open mindset to invite creativity.
  3. Welcome boring or automated tasks — These give your mind room to reframe ideas in new contexts.
  4. Escape your echo chamber — Seek out viewpoints that challenge your beliefs.
  5. Have productive disagreements — Talk with people who see things differently.
  6. Provoke your thinking — Read things you disagree with; challenge your mental routines.
  7. Appreciate your imperfect mind — Embrace being slow, irrational, and human — it's an advantage, not a flaw.

❌ Don’ts
  1. Don’t stay stuck in focused mode — Constant immersion doesn’t allow for creative breakthroughs.
  2. Don’t surround yourself only with like-minded opinions — It limits perspective and stifles innovation.
  3. Don’t consume media that only confirms your beliefs — It reinforces cognitive bias.
  4. Don’t think like an algorithm — Avoid rigid, rule-following mental habits.
  5. Don’t fear imperfection — Reject the myth that perfection is the path to insight.

--
TBC.. Oh, yes, Roger King definitely makes the cut :)

Sunday, April 13, 2025

You'll Love Math Problems After You Read This. Thank you, Hanna Poikonen

From November 2024's Scientific American..


Previous studies on neurocognition in mathematics focused on what happens in the brain while people consider problems that take a few seconds to solve. These studies have helped illuminate brain activity that supports focused attention and a special form of recall called working memory, which the brain uses to keep numbers and other details top of mind in the short term.

In our work, we used longer, more complex math challenges that had to be solved in multiple steps. These problems are more akin to the tricky puzzles that mathematicians must tackle regularly. We found that people with more experience in mathematics enter a special state of deep concentration when thinking about hard math problems.

Very slow delta brain waves are typically associated with deep sleep, not with intense concentration. So what was going on?

Subject

Observation

Indication

Students whose coursework involved little math

More signs of complex activity in the prefrontal cortex, an area just behind the forehead that is en­­gaged in all kinds of cognitive efforts.

These students working hard to understand complex steps of the demo being watched

Students who engaged in quantitative thinking regularly

Activity that appeared to link the frontal and parietal regions of their brain. More specifically, these areas exhibited a pattern of activity that neuroscientists call delta waves. These very slow waves of electrical activity are typically associated with states such as deep sleep.

The brain needs to suppress irrelevant external information and unneeded thoughts to concentrate on the task at hand. B waves were similar to those of experienced meditators

It’s also possible that this state of immersive concentration is generalizable: develop this way of thinking in one domain, whether it’s tackling trigonometry or playing the violin, and it could help you in others.

Are you a scientist who specializes in neuroscience, cognitive science or psychology? And have you read a recent peer-reviewed paper that you would like to write about for Mind Matters? Please send suggestions to Scientific American’s Mind Matters editor Daisy Yuhas at dyuhas@sciam.com



Wednesday, April 09, 2025

Gorilla Publishing - Springer and Elsevier


Every industry has certain problems universally acknowledged as broken: insurance in health care, licensing in music, standardized testing in education, tipping in the restaurant business. In academia, it’s publishing. Academic publishing is dominated by for-profit giants like Elsevier and Springer. Calling their practice a form of thuggery isn’t so much an insult as an economic observation. Imagine if a book publisher demanded that authors write books for free and, instead of employing in-house editors, relied on other authors to edit those books, also for free. And not only that: The final product was then sold at prohibitively expensive prices to ordinary readers, and institutions were forced to pay exorbitant fees for access.

Sheon Han, W.I.R.E.D

Google

Springer and Elsevier's dominance in academic publishing is rooted in several factors, including aggressive acquisition of smaller publishers, a focus on high-impact journals, and the lucrative nature of the academic publishing market. These companies also leverage the prestige of their publications to attract top researchers and, in turn, increase their profits. 

Key Factors in their Dominance:

Acquisitions:

Both companies have actively acquired smaller, specialized publishers, expanding their journal portfolios and market reach. 

High-Impact Journals:

They prioritize publishing in "prestigious" journals that are highly cited, as these journals are often crucial for career advancement and funding. 

Business Model:

Their business model involves charging high subscription fees to universities and libraries, while also generating revenue from Article Processing Charges (APCs) for open access articles. 

Market Influence:

The prestige of their journals, coupled with the dominance of a few large publishers, creates a competitive landscape where researchers are incentivized to publish in their publications. 

Open Access:

While increasingly embracing open access, they also maintain a hybrid model that allows for continued subscription revenue, sometimes leading to criticism about "double-dipping". 

Examples:

Springer:

Acquired Kluwer Academic Publishers in 2004, significantly expanding their journal portfolio. 

Elsevier:

Expanded its reach through acquisitions like North-Holland and Excerpta Medica, introducing technology to their publishing process. 

In essence, Springer and Elsevier have become dominant players in academic publishing by strategically acquiring competitors, focusing on high-impact journals, and leveraging a business model that benefits from both subscription fees and APCs, all while influencing the academic world's perceptions of research impact and career success. 

chatG

Springer and Elsevier rose to dominate academic publishing through a mix of historical timing, strategic mergers and acquisitions, and by capitalizing on how academic incentives work. Here's a breakdown of the key factors that led to their dominance:


1. Early Entry and Legacy

  • Elsevier (founded in 1880 in the Netherlands) and Springer (founded in 1842 in Germany) were among the earliest players in scientific publishing.

  • They gained a foothold in Europe and expanded globally as science became more international in the 20th century.


2. Massive Journal Portfolios

  • They built large catalogs of journals, especially during the post-WWII boom in science and technology.

  • Owning key journals gave them gatekeeping power over critical fields.


3. Mergers and Acquisitions

  • Elsevier acquired many publishers over the years, including Pergamon Press (1991) and part of Harcourt (2001).

  • Springer merged with Kluwer Academic Publishers (2004) and later became Springer Nature after a merger with Nature Publishing Group (2015).

  • These moves helped consolidate control over thousands of journals.


4. Subscription-Based Revenue Model

  • They pioneered the “Big Deal”: libraries would subscribe to bundles of journals instead of selecting individual titles.

  • This locked in recurring revenue and made it hard for libraries to cancel.

  • Universities were pressured to pay due to faculty and researcher demand.


5. Academia’s Incentives

  • Researchers are rewarded for publishing in prestigious journals — many of which these companies own.

  • These publishers don’t pay authors or peer reviewers, so they get content and quality control for free.

  • This system feeds their power: the more elite journals they own, the more researchers feel they must publish there.


6. Digital Shift and Paywalls

  • As journals went online, they created walled gardens of scientific knowledge.

  • Paywalls became a major source of profit. Elsevier, for example, has had profit margins over 30%, higher than Apple or Google in some years.


7. Slow Institutional Pushback

  • Only recently have movements like Open Access, Plan S, Sci-Hub, and institutional boycotts (e.g., from UC system) started to challenge them.

  • But these changes are slow, because academic publishing norms and tenure systems are deeply entrenched.