From the experts at The Mind Collection
# |
Name |
Summary |
1 |
Sagan’s Standard |
Extraordinary claims
require extraordinary evidence. |
2 |
Grice’s Razor |
Address what someone
meant to say instead of the literal meaning of the words. |
3 |
Hume’s Guillotine |
What ought to be
cannot be deduced from what is. |
4 |
Alder’s Razor |
If it cannot be settled
by observation or experiment, it’s not worth debating at all. |
5 |
Feynman’s Razor |
If you can’t explain
something simply, then you don’t really understand it. |
6 |
Hitchen’s Razor |
What can be asserted
without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. |
7 |
Occam’s Razor |
Simpler explanations
are more likely to be correct; avoid unnecessary or improbable assumptions. |
8 |
Hanlon’s Razor |
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. (British pithiness : "Cock-up before conspiracy") |
9 |
Riker’s Razor |
If someone’s
incompetence is too staggering to be true, they’re most likely faking it and
you should find out why. |
10 |
Jung’s Razor |
If you cannot understand
why someone did something, look at the consequences — and infer the
motivation. |
11 |
Chatton’s Anti-Razor |
If three things are
not enough to verify an affirmative proposition about things, a fourth must
be added and so on. |