From the experts at The Mind Collection
| # | Name | Summary | 
| 1 | Sagan’s Standard | Extraordinary claims
  require extraordinary evidence. | 
| 2 | Grice’s Razor | Address what someone
  meant to say instead of the literal meaning of the words. | 
| 3 | Hume’s Guillotine | What ought to be
  cannot be deduced from what is. | 
| 4 | Alder’s Razor | If it cannot be settled
  by observation or experiment, it’s not worth debating at all. | 
| 5 | Feynman’s Razor | If you can’t explain
  something simply, then you don’t really understand it. | 
| 6 | Hitchen’s Razor | What can be asserted
  without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. | 
| 7 | Occam’s Razor | Simpler explanations
  are more likely to be correct; avoid unnecessary or improbable assumptions. | 
| 8 | Hanlon’s Razor | Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. (British pithiness : "Cock-up before conspiracy") | 
| 9 | Riker’s Razor | If someone’s
  incompetence is too staggering to be true, they’re most likely faking it and
  you should find out why. | 
| 10 | Jung’s Razor | If you cannot understand
  why someone did something, look at the consequences — and infer the
  motivation. | 
| 11 | Chatton’s Anti-Razor | If three things are
  not enough to verify an affirmative proposition about things, a fourth must
  be added and so on. | 
